Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
America’s school districts, particularly in urban centers, find themselves caught in a near impossible situation. The emergency ESSER funds that kept districts afloat during the pandemic have disappeared, and enrollment has dropped by more than 1.2 million students since 2020. At the same time, classrooms are serving more students with disabilities and multilingual learners than ever before.
District leaders are now being asked to do the impossible: serve more complex student needs with fewer resources. The math doesn’t add up. And if we rely on the old playbook of across-the-board cuts, it’s our students, especially our most vulnerable, who will pay the price.
But there’s hope. Right now every district has access to a strategy powerful enough to save millions of dollars while improving, not sacrificing, student learning. The answer lies in the master schedule. And in 2025, it also lies in the responsible use of artificial intelligence optimization.
With 70% to 85% of district budgets dedicated to personnel, the master schedule is the single most powerful lever that leaders have. It decides how every teacher’s time is used, how every classroom is filled, and how every dollar is spent.
Yet too often, scheduling is treated as a yearly administrative headache. Old schedules get “rolled over,” locking in inefficiencies. The result? Some classes run half empty while others are overflowing. Teacher workloads vary wildly, fueling burnout. Budgets are strained, and reduction-in-forces quickly follow.
In our current reality of decreasing budgets, districts can’t afford to keep scheduling on autopilot.
In our districts, Lubbock Independent and Edgewood Independent, we faced the same brutal reality: declining enrollment, shrinking budgets and growing numbers of students with specialized needs. On paper, the choices looked bleak. Our communities braced for layoffs and program cuts that would inevitably fall hardest on students and teachers.
We refused to accept that.
Instead, we both turned to the master schedule and used AI-optimization tools to transform this process across our schools. We analyzed every teacher’s workload and class sizes across schools and subjects, revealing significant variations that weren’t aligned with student needs.
By leveraging AI, we were able to build schedules that rebalanced class sizes and workloads and resulted in significant savings — $2.2 million across 14 schools in Lubbock, $1.05 million districtwide in Edgewood.
In Lubbock, the program supported a transition to consolidate schools in our west Texas district. As we did a deep dive, we realized we did not have enough students to sustain fine arts and career-and-technical programming in all our middle schools. We made the difficult decision to close a school with declining enrollment starting this fall.
In Edgewood, which serves San Antonio’s west side, we faced overcrowded core classes and under-enrolled electives. By using AI-optimized scheduling, we rebalanced class sizes, shared staff more effectively across campuses, and absorbed changes through normal turnover.
In neither district did we lay off a single teacher; every staffing adjustment was a result of normal turnover and retirements. We were able to reinvest those dollars into new academic priorities that directly benefit students.
When we first turned to AI to help build our schedules, we quickly saw just how complex the task really was. A single high school schedule can involve over a million possible combinations of teacher, student, and period placements — and not all of them serve students equally well. In the past, we’d spend weeks trying to reconcile course requests with teacher assignments and room availability, only to end up rolling over parts of last year’s schedule because we ran out of time.
AI changed that. It analyzed thousands of possible scheduling scenarios, optimized for our goals and showed us solutions invisible to even the most experienced scheduler. Our teams were freed up to think strategically to ensure that our schedules aligned with school and district priorities while meeting the needs of our students.
For the first time, we weren’t defaulting to a legacy schedule. We were making deliberate, student-centered choices at a speed that simply wasn’t possible before
Our experiences aren’t isolated success stories. They represent a larger shift in how districts can approach resource allocation during times of fiscal uncertainty. But to make this shift, leaders need tools far more sophisticated than what most districts currently rely on.
As researchers at the Center for Public Leadership and Research at Columbia University have noted:
“The master schedule, an undoubtedly strategic tool, gets treated as a logistical one. This has disastrous consequences for students because it (1) masks the weight of the choices at hand, and (2) limits what is possible. In every case, the shift from technical to strategic scheduling was accompanied by a shift from limited to more sophisticated tools. As schools and systems sought to do more with their schedules, they stumbled over difficult-to-use tools and were pushed to find alternatives.”
Current solutions — clunky SIS schedulers, messy spreadsheets, whiteboards, magnet tiles — simply aren’t enough for the complexity of today’s challenges.
We know AI often raises skepticism in education, with fears about replacing teachers or removing authentic classroom engagement. But scheduling is different. It’s not about replacing human judgment, it’s about freeing up scheduling teams to focus on higher-level decisions about how our schedule serves our students
If there is one place where AI belongs in education right now, it’s here: in the master schedule.
In 2025 the question isn’t whether districts can afford to invest in better master scheduling, it’s whether they can afford not to. For districts serious about navigating financial setbacks while preserving quality educational experiences, the master schedule may be their most powerful untapped resource.
Visibility is everything in a time of uncertainty. When leaders see clearly how resources are allocated and understand the impact of scheduling decisions on both budget and student outcomes, they can make choices that truly serve the needs of their communities.
We’ve lived this transformation. Our message to our colleagues is simple but urgent: don’t approach scheduling this year the way you always have. Treat it as your chance to build stronger, more sustainable schools for the students and communities we serve. The master schedule is not a burden, it’s a blueprint for success.
Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
